×

INDI Library v2.0.6 is Released (02 Feb 2024)

Bi-monthly release with minor bug fixes and improvements

New INDI Atik driver - Feedback requested

I informed Atik about this, we'll see their feedback.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Jarno Paananen
5 years 3 months ago #32466

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.


Ok can you please contact Atik directly at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ?
5 years 3 months ago #32493

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 472
  • Thank you received: 165
Ok, I'll take some log and send it there.
5 years 3 months ago #32495

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 71
  • Thank you received: 2
at a recent test with my atik 383l+ i noticed that i have bin options that go over 20x20
HEQ5 Pro Rowan Belt Mod, GSO RC8'', SW ED80, Atik 383L+, Atik EFW2, Atik OAG, SX Lodestar, ZWO ASI 120MC
5 years 3 months ago #32498

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 472
  • Thank you received: 165
Abort issue should now be fixed in master, it was a case of not waiting for camera to go idle after abort, which causes the sensor to be flushed in a similar way as regular image download would and also takes the same amount of time and starting a new exposure during this time caused this issue.

Also noticed the large bin options, but they seem to work fine, though something like 32x32 binning isn't very useful :)
The following user(s) said Thank You: Patrick Chevalley
5 years 3 months ago #32517

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 18
  • Thank you received: 4
Hello,
I use yesterday for the first time this new driver. It is very good to have a free driver for atik.
I schedule poses of 300s.
The images stops after 30 exposures (But it was time to sleep).
I don't now why, I will look at the logs.
Anyway, it is a good news to have a free atik driver.
Jean-Jacques
5 years 3 months ago #32557

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 95
  • Thank you received: 14
I'm a little confused & dismayed over all this....

There has been a free & fully functioning INDI Atik driver for quite some time from Peter @ Cloudmakers (which I have been using very successfully with my Atik 16200 & Atik EFW )

Why the need to duplicate effort and go through all the laborious testing & fixing when one is already around?

At the very least, a collaboration between Jasem & Peter (who is a member & contributor here) would have cut down on all this testing?

As now, any re-compile I have to do will require that I specifically disable the GIT Atik branch in order to retain what I know already does what I need!

Phil
Last edit: 5 years 3 months ago by Phil Shepherd.
5 years 3 months ago #32561

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 472
  • Thank you received: 165
There is a fundamental and very important difference between free and open source software. Contributing new features or fixes directly is not possible in close source case, so it's all pending on the sole author, all you can do is report issues and wishes and hope for the best. When the author stops supporting the driver, it works as long as the environment happens to be similar and so on. Before this I used Peter's driver for a couple of years and it mostly worked (and I reported the issues I had) but had issues with old libraries being required and so on, which would have been trivial to fix had it been open sourced, but couldn't in a fixed binary release that would need to work on multiple OS versions.

There was a similar situation with Peter's USB_FocusV3 driver which for some reason wasn't open sourced unlike many of his other drivers (for example SX driver I also use), and never worked correctly in Raspberry Pi due to compiler issues so I wrote my own (by coincidence there was another driver written for it around the same time which was more polished so that one is included in INDI and I dropped my own version and improved that one instead, another good thing about open source).

One technical improvement is that this new driver uses Atik's own SDK (as does Peter's new open source INDIGO driver, but his old INDI driver did not) which should make it easier to support new camera models and benefits from fixes and features Atik makes for their Windows drivers and so on.

So while I'm very grateful for Peter's work I'm also very happy about this open source driver.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Eric
5 years 3 months ago #32562

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 95
  • Thank you received: 14
I of course understand these differences... and fully understand your points (& in general agree)... Although not a C++ programmer, I managed to write a focuser driver and decided to pass it onto here as a contribution.

But surely some of the issues and/or difficulties being experienced now might have been avoided if a collaboration was attempted at the start?

I am curious - Did anyone contact Peter?

(apologies for going off topic)
Last edit: 5 years 3 months ago by Phil Shepherd.
5 years 3 months ago #32564

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 472
  • Thank you received: 165
As far as I know Jasem did talk with Peter multiple times about this but there was some IPR issue with the camera SDK used. But this is just my recollection from discussions with Jasem, so it would be better if either of them commented directly.

As far as these current difficulties are concerned, at least the ones I fixed (temperature reading while downloading image and abort flushing) had more to do with the Atik SDK which the old driver doesn't use so while it would have obviously been good to have more collaboration, it might not have made much difference. All in all I was actually very pleasantly surprised how well the driver worked already in its initial version and have been using it ever since, but it could also just be that working as a programmer I'm probably more pessimistic about software in general than usual :)
5 years 3 months ago #32566

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 95
  • Thank you received: 14
Fair do's... should't really comment on other people's conversations..

Have Atik come back regarding their SDK? I do know one of the guys from there if you need me to give them a kick?

Phil
5 years 3 months ago #32567

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 472
  • Thank you received: 165
Yes, I got reply back from their support and a new version of the SDK that fixed the abort issue, with some additional fixing on the INDI driver side, both are in git now.
5 years 3 months ago #32568

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 2.037 seconds