×
INDI Library v1.8.3 Released (02 Jan 2020)

Minor monthly bugfix release with a new RainbowAstro mount driver and improved pier side simulation.

ASTAP astrometry integration

3 months 1 week ago
rankinstudio
Expert Boarder
Expert Boarder
Posts: 91
More
ASTAP astrometry integration #45855
Just want to say, I had nothing but headaches working with the astrometry.net local server. This ASTAP solver is GREAT! Can't believe the improvement. Solves all fields, and usually within 1 second. Amazing.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

3 months 1 week ago
han.k
Gold Boarder
Gold Boarder
Posts: 206
Karma: 6
More
ASTAP astrometry integration #45857
Rankinstudio,

Thanks for the feedback.

A technical question. I'm still a little worried about the problem with the CDELT1, CDELT2 keywords in the fits header. I'm still try to understand the scale of the problem. 1) Did you update INDI with the fix of Jasem? 2) Do you have the possibility to check if the FITS files contain the header keywords CDELT1, CDELT2 prior to solving and if they are correct? The problem is that these CDELT1, CDELT2 values overrule the focal length and pixel size setting.

Han

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

3 months 1 week ago
rankinstudio
Expert Boarder
Expert Boarder
Posts: 91
More
ASTAP astrometry integration #45859
Hi Han,

Not familiar with the issue.

I did update everything before attempting to use ASTAP as the solver. So far have had no issues at all. I've used the images generated from INDI & ASTAP solved in Aladin and Astrometrica. Seems to work fine.

Cheers

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

3 months 5 days ago
pug916
Expert Boarder
Expert Boarder
Posts: 94
Karma: 2
More
ASTAP astrometry integration #46004
I have one issue with ASTAP in EKOS as I've had mixed results getting to it to solve. My scope is currently in its 1400mm FL setup. After some trial and error I find I have to set the binning to 1x1 (from 4x4 that I've been using with Astrometry) and I have to change the default "r30" for ASTAP to "r50". This then solves quite well. The problem now though is that for all subsequent solves, it reverts that setting back to "r30" again. How do I make permanent changes to this in EKOS please. I'm running v3.3.7 on a Mac if this helps.

Skywatcher EQ6R / EdgeHD 8" / ZWO 1600MC Cool / ZWO 120MM-S

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

3 months 5 days ago
knro
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 7638
Karma: 51
Topic Author
ASTAP astrometry integration #46007
In ASTAP option you can set the search radius.

Jasem Mutlaq
Support INDI & Ekos; Get StellarMate Astrophotography Gadget.
How to Submit Logs when you have problems?
Add your observatory info

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

3 months 5 days ago
han.k
Gold Boarder
Gold Boarder
Posts: 206
Karma: 6
More
ASTAP astrometry integration #46010

pug916 wrote: I After some trial and error I find I have to set the binning to 1x1 (from 4x4 that I've been using with Astrometry) .


ASTAP behaves differently. As long you adapt the settings for that , it will work fine:

- Resolution, the image height should be 1000 pixels or more. So adapt (decrease) binning.
- Stars shall be pretty round and reasonable in focus.
- FOV (field of view) shall be specified within 5 % accuracy for maximum reliability but detection is possible if FOV is 30 or 40% off. So set focal ratio, sensor/pixel size correct.
- Image shall not be severely saturated or stretched. RAW images works best.

Han
The following user(s) said Thank You pug916

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

3 months 5 days ago
pug916
Expert Boarder
Expert Boarder
Posts: 94
Karma: 2
More
ASTAP astrometry integration #46040
I have all those requirements met Han. Astrometry is having zero problems, but is a tad slower.

I can get ASTAP to solve consistently but only when default of “r30” as the CLI option is changed to “r50”. I need it to be “r50” (and have that change made permanent for this scope configuration) as right now every time it goes back for another solve it reverts it back to “r30” as the CLI option again.plate solving is failing ~50% of the time with that setting.

Skywatcher EQ6R / EdgeHD 8" / ZWO 1600MC Cool / ZWO 120MM-S

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

3 months 5 days ago
han.k
Gold Boarder
Gold Boarder
Posts: 206
Karma: 6
More
ASTAP astrometry integration #46041
You have to set that option in the settings you can activate by the "pencil" symbol. See below. This will set -r 50 in the command line meaning a search radius of 50 degrees max.

Han

Attachments:
The following user(s) said Thank You pug916

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

3 months 5 days ago
pug916
Expert Boarder
Expert Boarder
Posts: 94
Karma: 2
More
ASTAP astrometry integration #46054
Ah, there it is....sorry, I thought I checked in there. Thank you kind sir!!!!

Skywatcher EQ6R / EdgeHD 8" / ZWO 1600MC Cool / ZWO 120MM-S

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

3 months 5 days ago
pug916
Expert Boarder
Expert Boarder
Posts: 94
Karma: 2
More
ASTAP astrometry integration #46055
Oh, Han I can send through logs if you think it'd help at all?

Skywatcher EQ6R / EdgeHD 8" / ZWO 1600MC Cool / ZWO 120MM-S

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

3 months 5 days ago
han.k
Gold Boarder
Gold Boarder
Posts: 206
Karma: 6
More
ASTAP astrometry integration #46056
Logs could help but easiest way to analyse a solve problem is to send me an image. Either a link to file at a google drive or an uploaded image at nova.astrometry.net

Han

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

2 months 3 weeks ago
tkottary
Expert Boarder
Expert Boarder
Posts: 125
More
ASTAP astrometry integration #46393
is it possible to flex the min allowed image height to 960px from 1000px ? I use zwo 120mm-s along with mini guidescope. ASTAP fails to plate solve the image from this during the Ekos polar alignment

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.911 seconds