×

INDI Library v2.0.7 is Released (01 Apr 2024)

Bi-monthly release with minor bug fixes and improvements

Is ASTAP ready for seamless integration in EKOS?

  • Posts: 209
  • Thank you received: 33
I followed your indications except for "-r 30 -z 0 -speed auto" because this setting returned to "-r 30 -speed auto"

The file M101.fits failed, the file M106.fits solved as earlier.
3 years 11 months ago #52253
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 209
  • Thank you received: 33
The image size was 4656 x 3520 for both frames
3 years 11 months ago #52254

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 333
  • Thank you received: 92
Yes that's fine. The problem is that some users have the habit to bin the images down to something like 600x400 pixels for quick download and Astrometry.net will solve it. ASTAP is a different program and it can't compute those images. ASTAP requires some resolution and also the intensity of the stars. With the intensity it can separate the bright from the faint stars. An other problem for solving is severe stretching but that doesn't happen in Ekos. ASTAP works well with raw images and resolutions above 1080 x 960 pixels.

Han
Last edit: 3 years 11 months ago by han.
3 years 11 months ago #52256

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 333
  • Thank you received: 92
Okay your running on the Mac. Can you provide me with the image mention in this command line:



So the file in /private/var/folders/2b/...........................

There you will also find the solution.ini Attach that one also. (Should contain the same command as in your screenshot)


Han
Last edit: 3 years 11 months ago by han.
3 years 11 months ago #52260
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 209
  • Thank you received: 33
OK that was difficult but I found the file
3 years 11 months ago #52264
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 333
  • Thank you received: 92
Good but the FITS file is missing. Can you upload it somewhere? :

/private/var/folders/2b/5hc0l8dw8xl0g30059b1n9180000gn/T/fitsYeFVEO.fits

Regards, Han
3 years 11 months ago #52266

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 209
  • Thank you received: 33
The missing file : You already downloaded the folder "Test Files.zip" containing 2 files M101.fits and M106.fits : dl.free.fr/tt9pzyXJ6
3 years 11 months ago #52268

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 209
  • Thank you received: 33
_Light_M101.fits is M101.fits
3 years 11 months ago #52270

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 333
  • Thank you received: 92
Yes but the question what did Ekos do with the image. Was it downsampled and how much. The image_Light_M101.fits solves without problem. but is the image at:

/private/var/folders/2b/5hc0l8dw8xl0g30059b1n9180000gn/T/fitsYeFVEO.fits

the same or downsampled and is it still 16 bit? We can only test with that image.


Han
3 years 11 months ago #52273

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 209
  • Thank you received: 33
I cannot answer these questions but I can repeat that this image - as you got it - could be solved by ASTAP.app and not by EKOS
3 years 11 months ago #52277

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 333
  • Thank you received: 92
The _Light_M101.fits is solved by ASTAP without problems.

Ekos instructs ASTAP to solve this image
/private/var/folders/2b/5hc0l8dw8xl0g30059b1n9180000gn/T/fitsYeFVEO.fits

But this image doesn't solve. The command-line looks good. You have most likely have instructed EKOS to downsample the original image at this menu:


So the image should have half of the dimensions as the original. That's no problem because ASTAP will still be able to solve it. I can only proof/test it by the
/private/var/folders/2b/5hc0l8dw8xl0g30059b1n9180000gn/T/fitsYeFVEO.fits
image. Maybe down-sampling isn't done as expected. Maybe essential header info is missing or wrong. I can only test/investigate with this image.


An other thing you could try is just set the downsampling in above menu at 1. Then the image should the same and hopefully also the headers.


Han
Last edit: 3 years 11 months ago by han.
3 years 11 months ago #52279
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 209
  • Thank you received: 33
As yet, I will stop trying to use ASTAP and use Astro.net.
Thanks for your help
3 years 11 months ago #52298

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.931 seconds