It's much better now, I can again make long exposures with ekos or indi control panel. Thanks !
However, I get erratic results in two cases: when there are digits after the decimal for exposure time (for example, 5.50 gives 5.063523 , 10.50 => 10.064609, 0.70 => 0.060172, etc.) either by Ekos or by the INDI control panel. I should avoid for now to pose below the second, and in general avoid digits after the decimal. Maybe a problem with the regional format management between commas and points in the numbers?
The second problem happens when I program a series of images. For example, ten images of five seconds:
2014-05-09T00:00:14: Capture of ONE frame (1 stacked frames) took 4.616194 seconds.
2014-05-09T00:00:09: Capture of ONE frame (1 stacked frames) took 4.623662 seconds.
2014-05-09T00:00:03: Capture of ONE frame (1 stacked frames) took 4.570533 seconds.
2014-05-08T23:59:58: Capture of ONE frame (1 stacked frames) took 4.557049 seconds.
2014-05-08T23:59:53: Capture of ONE frame (1 stacked frames) took 4.566814 seconds.
2014-05-08T23:59:48: Capture of ONE frame (1 stacked frames) took 4.526086 seconds.
2014-05-08T23:59:43: Capture of ONE frame (1 stacked frames) took 4.616735 seconds.
2014-05-08T23:59:38: Capture of ONE frame (1 stacked frames) took 4.479772 seconds.
2014-05-08T23:59:33: Capture of ONE frame (1 stacked frames) took 4.516213 seconds.
2014-05-08T23:59:28: Capture of ONE frame (1 stacked frames) took 5.063938 seconds.
And five images of 20 seconds :
2014-05-09T00:11:03: Capture of ONE frame (1 stacked frames) took 14.386489 seconds.
2014-05-09T00:11:23: Capture of ONE frame (1 stacked frames) took 19.428895 seconds.
2014-05-09T00:11:43: Capture of ONE frame (1 stacked frames) took 19.519953 seconds.
2014-05-09T00:12:03: Capture of ONE frame (1 stacked frames) took 19.574932 seconds.
2014-05-09T00:12:23: Capture of ONE frame (1 stacked frames) took 19.560687 seconds.
But the exposure times that are displayed are perhaps not correct, if we refer to time intervals ?