×

INDI Library v2.0.7 is Released (01 Apr 2024)

Bi-monthly release with minor bug fixes and improvements

Unable to use Online Astrometry

  • Posts: 124
  • Thank you received: 13
As I have very long FL sometimes online astrometry is only one that will result with solving.

In astroberry it worked flawlesly ,but now when I upgraded to most recent stellarmate, it refuses to send anyting to online astrometry.

I have turned off position, scale, switched to Online Astrometry and set Built In Method for solver for Star Extraction.

Is there something I am missing?

Please check you have sufficient stars in the image, the indicated FOV is correct, and the necessary index files are installed. Enable Alignment Logging in Setup Tab -> Logs to get detailed information on the failure.
2 months 1 week ago #99104

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 1224
  • Thank you received: 566
Not sure why online doesn't work, but I'll be we can get offline working.
Please post an image that you can't get to solve with the internal solver.
FWIW, I have a FOV of about 1/2 degree wide with my 10" RC and have no issues solving.

Hy
2 months 1 week ago #99121

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 124
  • Thank you received: 13
nova.astrometry.net/user_images/9384399#annotated

Here it is. But I really do not mind astrometry online it takes few mins but it is 100%

[2024-02-17T22:04:10.108 CET DEBG ][     org.kde.kstars.ekos.align] - Align state changed to "In Progress"
[2024-02-17T22:04:10.111 CET INFO ][     org.kde.kstars.ekos.align] - "Capturing image..."
[2024-02-17T22:04:10.149 CET DEBG ][           org.kde.kstars.indi] - SVBONY CCD SV705C : "[DEBUG] Camera soft trigger mode "
[2024-02-17T22:04:10.150 CET DEBG ][           org.kde.kstars.indi] - SVBONY CCD SV705C : "[DEBUG] StartExposure->setexp : 25.000s "
[2024-02-17T22:04:10.175 CET INFO ][           org.kde.kstars.indi] - SVBONY CCD SV705C :  "[INFO] Taking a 25 seconds frame... "
[2024-02-17T22:04:35.289 CET DEBG ][           org.kde.kstars.indi] - SVBONY CCD SV705C : "[DEBUG] Retrieved exposure data: SVBGetVideoData(SVB_SUCCESS) "
[2024-02-17T22:04:35.292 CET INFO ][           org.kde.kstars.indi] - SVBONY CCD SV705C :  "[INFO] Download complete. "
[2024-02-17T22:04:35.295 CET INFO ][           org.kde.kstars.indi] - SVBONY CCD SV705C :  "[INFO] Exposure done, downloading image... "
[2024-02-17T22:04:35.296 CET DEBG ][           org.kde.kstars.indi] - SVBONY CCD SV705C : "[DEBUG] Exposure complete "
[2024-02-17T22:04:35.320 CET DEBG ][           org.kde.kstars.indi] - SVBONY CCD SV705C : "[DEBUG] Uploading file. Ext: fits, Size: 16819200, sendImage? Yes, saveImage? No "
[2024-02-17T22:04:35.322 CET DEBG ][           org.kde.kstars.indi] - SVBONY CCD SV705C : "[DEBUG] BLOB transfer took 0.00023646 seconds "
[2024-02-17T22:04:35.323 CET DEBG ][           org.kde.kstars.indi] - SVBONY CCD SV705C : "[DEBUG] Upload complete "
[2024-02-17T22:04:35.556 CET DEBG ][           org.kde.kstars.indi] - Image received. Mode: "Align" Size: 16819200
[2024-02-17T22:04:35.786 CET INFO ][     org.kde.kstars.ekos.align] - "Image received."
[2024-02-17T22:04:35.819 CET INFO ][           org.kde.kstars.fits] - Saved FITS file: "/tmp/solver29d263c9816a4196b7d30a804146c8cb.fits"
[2024-02-17T22:04:35.945 CET DEBG ][     org.kde.kstars.ekos.align] - Align state changed to "In Progress"
[2024-02-17T22:04:35.956 CET INFO ][     org.kde.kstars.ekos.align] - "Solver Failed."
[2024-02-17T22:04:35.957 CET DEBG ][     org.kde.kstars.ekos.align] - Align state changed to "Failed"
Last edit: 2 months 1 week ago by Outta.
2 months 1 week ago #99144

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 124
  • Thank you received: 13
Here is another one
nova.astrometry.net/user_images/9384463#annotated

It is same using default 4 Small Scale solve and 1 Default
2 months 1 week ago #99145

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 1224
  • Thank you received: 566
Please upload these two files somewhere so I can download the fits files onto my machine.
2 months 1 week ago #99146

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 124
  • Thank you received: 13
You can dowoad it from astrometry:
File Attachment:


Right click on solve.fits and click save as
2 months 1 week ago #99148

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 1224
  • Thank you received: 566
Did not work for me, tried that unsuccessfully before and just retried same. It says "This does not look like a FITS file". It is only 4Mb.
Please post your original file somewhere and send the link.
Hy
2 months 1 week ago #99149

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 124
  • Thank you received: 13
Ooooh ok, here are they. Mind you this two might be a bit different ones as I save and manually upload all the the time to astrometry but situation is the same,

drive.google.com/drive/folders/1qmRNUa3v...MnakjalLohCGp0hD9KHt
Last edit: 2 months 1 week ago by Outta.
2 months 1 week ago #99160

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 1224
  • Thank you received: 566
Got your two images.

I am debugging this with the FITS Viewer's solver, and you can try and reproduce my experiments.
Open the fitsviewer solver, which is documented in the KStars handbook, currently on page 169
docs.kde.org/trunk5/en/kstars/kstars/kst...f#fits-viewer-solver

I was able to solve solve2.fits with the configuration below using my align profile



and here's the Align profile I had. I didn't play around with parameters, it was the first solve I tried with it once I set "use scale" to the right value, which I found in the fits header.
(It may not be the default, you can play around with it, but I'd be surprised if there are major changes with other similar numbers.



Note that only 7 stars were found, so that is pretty few stars for a plate solve.

In the other image, solve.fits, there were only 4 stars detected and the solve failed for me, but that image is much worse quality. That is, look like there is a guiding bump or star trail (i.e. several stars are doubled). Something like that would cause solving issues.

Hy
2 months 1 week ago #99172
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 124
  • Thank you received: 13
Oh yes the secondary one is very bad, as I said it was probably different than original, but online astrometry does that one as well

nova.astrometry.net/user_images/9391056#annotated

I will try your parameters, but suprise suprise, it is cloudy :)

Also, can you try using Online Astrometry as default with bad one so we can report bug to Jasem? Maybe star extraction is happening even for Online astrometry and that is why it fails?
2 months 1 week ago #99175

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 1224
  • Thank you received: 566
You can try the fitsviewer solver even if it is cloudy!
Use load that image into fitsviewer and solve it.

Sorry, I don't have time in the next week or two to mess with other things.
Hy
2 months 1 week ago #99177

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 124
  • Thank you received: 13
Ok that is interesting turn of events, when I click Solve on FitsViewer, whole kstars crashes. There is nothing significant in logs.

[2024-02-19T11:21:05.931 CET INFO ][ org.kde.kstars.fits] - Saved FITS file: "/tmp/solvera011eff4b132428cbf4914cd6270123c.fits"
2 months 1 week ago #99189

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.816 seconds